In September 2025, Florida entered a new legal era when the First District Court of Appeal struck down the state’s longstanding ban on open carry in McDaniels v. State. The decision followed the reasoning of New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen (2022), which requires firearm restrictions to align with the nation’s historical tradition of regulation. The court held that Florida’s prohibition on open carry failed that standard and was therefore unconstitutional.
When no appeal was filed, the ruling became effective statewide on September 25, 2025, and Attorney General James Uthmeier confirmed that open carry was lawful throughout Florida. Law enforcement agencies were directed to cease enforcing the prior ban.
Although the ruling expanded rights for lawful gun owners, open carry remains limited by numerous statutory restrictions, and professional firearm authorization under Chapter 493 of the Florida Statutes remains distinct from personal firearm rights.
The McDaniels decision overturned the Florida Supreme Court’s prior ruling in Norman v. State, 215 So.3d 18 (Fla. 2017), which had upheld the open carry ban under a less protective legal standard. Applying the Bruen framework, the First DCA found that the state failed to demonstrate any historical precedent justifying a categorical ban on open carry.
The decision affirms that the right to bear arms includes carrying firearms publicly for self-defense, subject to restrictions in sensitive places. However, the ruling did not alter the specific licensing scheme that governs armed professionals such as private investigators, security officers, and protection specialists under Chapter 493.
Even after McDaniels, open carry remains prohibited in many locations. Under state and federal law, firearms may not be carried—openly or concealed—in the following areas:
Violations of these restrictions can result in misdemeanor or felony charges. Property owners and employers retain authority to prohibit firearms on their premises, and refusal to comply with such restrictions can constitute armed trespassing under Florida law.
Florida law draws a clear distinction between personal concealed carry rights and professional firearm authorization under Chapter 493, Florida Statutes.
A licensed Private Investigator (Class “C”) may not carry a firearm while performing investigative duties under a regular Concealed Weapon License (CWL) issued pursuant to Chapter 790. The CWL authorizes personal concealed carry for self-defense but does not extend to employment-related firearm use.
To lawfully carry a firearm while on duty, a private investigator must obtain a Class “G” Statewide Firearm License, which authorizes firearm possession only within the course and scope of licensed employment.
(Florida Statute § 493.6115)
A private investigator may carry under the Class “G” license only during official assignments and with agency authorization. The firearm must be the same caliber and type used for qualification. Carrying off duty under a “G” license is prohibited unless the investigator also possesses a personal concealed weapon license for self-defense.
Not all investigations justify or require an armed presence. In fact, most routine investigative work—such as background checks, surveillance from public vantage points, interviews, and document service—should be conducted unarmed. The decision to authorize a private investigator to carry a firearm must be made with caution, based on both operational necessity and client safety.
An armed assignment may be justified when one or more of the following conditions exist:
Before assigning an armed investigator, the agency must evaluate the operational risk, document the justification, and issue written authorization. The investigator must carry identification and proof of both Class “C” and Class “G” licenses at all times while armed. Firearms should remain holstered, and display or use is justified only under the same standard of lawful self-defense that applies to any citizen under Chapter 776, Florida Statutes.
Carrying a firearm during low-risk civil or domestic investigations is strongly discouraged and may expose both the investigator and agency to liability for negligence or excessive force if an incident occurs.
The McDaniels ruling applies only within Florida. Once a firearm owner crosses state lines, that person becomes subject to the firearm laws of each jurisdiction traveled through.
The McDaniels v. State decision represents a historic expansion of Second Amendment rights in Florida, allowing lawful open carry for the first time in decades. However, this new right does not extend automatically to licensed investigators or other security professionals.
Private Investigators must hold a valid Class “G” Statewide Firearm License to be armed while on duty and should carry only when operational conditions justify doing so. Most investigative assignments remain unarmed, and responsible discretion protects both the investigator and the public.
When traveling beyond Florida, firearm owners must follow the laws of the destination and federal transport regulations. The hallmark of a professional investigator is not only legal authority but also disciplined judgment and measured restraint.
Florida Statutes
Case Law
Official and News Sources
© 2025 Bedan Investigations & Litigation Support
Licensed Florida Private Investigative Agency – A-Class License Pending / C3500448
www.bedangroup.com
© 2025 Bedan Group, LLC. All rights reserved. Bedan Investigations & Litigation Support is a Florida-licensed private investigative agency operating under F.S. Chapter 493. License No. A3500265 | Principal Investigator: Semyon Berezhansky, C3500448 This site is for informational purposes only and does not create an attorney–client, investigator–client, or any other professional relationship. Do not submit confidential information through this form.